Plumbline / CT / contractor

Printed from Plumbline, a free public-record license check. This page: https://contractors.agentlookups.ai/ct/contractor/656541-jean-c-telusmar · Statuses change; check the live page before you rely on this sheet.

JEAN C TELUSMAR

CT license 656541 (HIC) · Bolivia

License Expired as of 2026-08-10
Source status: "INACTIVE" per Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP). The badge summarizes the sourced record below; the record and the issuing agency's live page are what count.
This is JEAN C TELUSMAR's own professional license record, as published by the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP). It is not a background check, and it is not a consumer report. Do not use it for any FCRA purpose: not for employment, tenant, credit, or insurance screening. We show only this one occupational-license record and its official source; we do not aggregate other records about this person and we make no characterization of them.

The Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) snapshot dated 2026-08-10 shows license 656541 (HIC) with status "INACTIVE", expired 2020-11-30. The issuing agency's live page is authoritative for today.

What this status means

The Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) snapshot from 2026-08-10 does not show this license as active and in good standing. That is what the record said on that date. It is not a judgment about the person or the business. Before you act on it:

Hiring soon? The full checklist: How do I check if a contractor is legit?

What the record shows

Status
INACTIVE (in plain terms: inactive)
Expires
2020-11-30
Issued
2019-10-21

Source: Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP), snapshot 2026-08-10. The issuing agency's live page is authoritative for today: official CT lookup.

For developers and AI agents: source snapshot file sha256:4245a5465de81dc3890c6b5acece7b7cca50699a5d029639d5566106f85d603d (row 119286). This is the archived source file we read this record from, and the row within it; the file hash is shared by every record in the same fetch, so it identifies the snapshot, not the individual record.

What we did not check