Plumbline / RI / contractor

Printed from Plumbline, a free public-record license check. This page: https://contractors.agentlookups.ai/ri/contractor/HI-44018-m-m-contracting · Statuses change; check the live page before you rely on this sheet.

M & M CONTRACTING

RI license HI-44018 (HOME INSPECTOR)

License Expired as of 2026-08-25
Source status: "INVALID" per Rhode Island Contractors' Registration and Licensing Board (CRLB). The badge summarizes the sourced record below; the record and the issuing agency's live page are what count.
This is M & M CONTRACTING's own professional license record, as published by the Rhode Island Contractors' Registration and Licensing Board (CRLB). It is not a background check, and it is not a consumer report. Do not use it for any FCRA purpose: not for employment, tenant, credit, or insurance screening. We show only this one occupational-license record and its official source; we do not aggregate other records about this person and we make no characterization of them.

The Rhode Island Contractors' Registration and Licensing Board (CRLB) snapshot dated 2026-08-25 shows license HI-44018 (HOME INSPECTOR) with status "INVALID", expired 2022-04-01. The issuing agency's live page is authoritative for today.

What this status means

The Rhode Island Contractors' Registration and Licensing Board (CRLB) snapshot from 2026-08-25 does not show this license as active and in good standing. That is what the record said on that date. It is not a judgment about the person or the business. Before you act on it:

Hiring soon? The full checklist: How do I check if a contractor is legit?

What the record shows

Status
INVALID (in plain terms: inactive)
Expires
2022-04-01

Source: Rhode Island Contractors' Registration and Licensing Board (CRLB), snapshot 2026-08-25. The issuing agency's live page is authoritative for today: official RI lookup.

For developers and AI agents: source snapshot file sha256:f1c11eb0f9db905fc9e4a5549e0c415ea7673ee5acd6f218ae131b5e222696be (row 19411). This is the archived source file we read this record from, and the row within it; the file hash is shared by every record in the same fetch, so it identifies the snapshot, not the individual record.

What we did not check